Most Popular JS Frameworks Overview
While you get lots of space for creativity and experimentation, sometimes you are unsure about what library or framework to choose.
The front-end framework you choose can make or break your project in the long run.
- A quick set of popularity: in just a few years since its inception, many enterprises have added Vue.js to their technical stack.
- Quick Setup: Vue has built-in data binding and an MVC model (model, view, controller), which makes configuration much easier compared to Angular.js and React.js.
- Easier integration: the platform supports easier integration with HTML elements.
- Small learning curve: compared to the Angular JS Framework, Vue is much easier to learn, understand, and use.
- Few resources: the structure is still too young to find useful solutions on the Internet and self-study.
- Small community engagement: Vue.js is new to the market and has less community support than Angular and React technologies.
You can also read more about the framework Vue.js in our article here https://amoniac.eu/blog/post/why-we-fell-in-love-with-vue-js
- Fast, flexible, efficient and lightweight technology: The JS system is widely recommended for its efficiency, small block size, flexibility and a quicker approach to work due to its simple component model and server-side rendering functionality.
- A transition between versions: migration between versions is usually very simple, Facebook provides “codemods” to automate a huge part of the process. 4. Feels great when working with ES6 / 7 ReactJS, can take on any load.
- The structure has a component architecture that revolutionized web application development and influenced other technologies.
- DOM allows you to combine HTML, XHTML or XML documents follow certain criteria, most often into a tree, so React is excellent for web browsers when analyzing various elements of web applications.
- Big learning curve: Unlike Vue, React takes more time to learn concepts and implement. React JS requires a massive amount of knowledge in how to integrate the user interface into the MVC structure.
- Lack of streamlined documentation: the super-fast exchange of solutions in ReactJS leaves no room for streamlining the documentation, the documents are placed a bit chaotic, since many developers individually enter them into the database without any systematic approach.
- Two-way data binding.
- Mobile approach to web development.
- Support PWA.
- Stable and long-term support for Google.
- Universal MVVM module, allows you to separately operate in one section of the application, using the same data set.
- Interdependence of functions, because of their connectedness with components and modules.
- RXJS, lightning fast compilation, less than 2.9 seconds, modified start HttpClient.
- Poor optimization: Angular.js based applications require more optimization to solve low-performance problems.
- Big learning curve: Angular shows a high learning scale, you need more time to master this structure.
- Integration errors: may occur during the transition from the old version to the new one.
- Difficult programming language: although Angular uses TypeScript 2.4.
- Ember Data Library: this is one of the best libraries for API level requests and data retrieval in the local app store.
- Ember CLI: an idea stolen from Rails, but this feature makes Ember.js very convenient.
- Many extensions (ember addons) that can be easily added to the application using a single terminal command (ember install). The centralized repository of all add-ons along with the search is also enjoyable.
- Built-in testing tools: standard ember-cli comes with QUnit.
- Ember Data: suitable for standard REST API requests only.
- Many ember addons: ports existing in the jQuery library.
- Relationship with jQuery: it would be much more convenient if Ember would use axios or a standard sample to create ajax requests.
- No server-side rendering.
- No Redux. Enough said.
Backbone is an MV* framework. Backbone partly implements an MVC architecture, as Backbone’s View part carries out the responsibilities of the Controller.
- View: the view part of Backbone apps, Backbone views implement component logic, how model data is rendered to the browser, similar to a Controller in MVC, you can bind views and models so that the view will change whenever model data is altered. Backbone view can use third-party templating engines like Mustache and Underscore.js.
- Collection: which are just arrays of similar models, if your app has different types of users, each user type will be represented by a separate model, and all user models can be iterated over in Backbone collections.
- Events: a class that let's implement and use events, both custom, and built-in, and bind various events to Backbone models, collections, routes, and views.
- Router: an interface that maps URLs to different components of an app, Backbone's router depends on the history object to work with browser history.
- REST: a simple API that we can use to synchronize the front end and back end more specifically, to request persistent model data and collections from the server.
- Backbone’s view layer can’t render itself to the DOM: This is where Marionette and Thorax come into, they let make Backbone views to the DOM.
- Work with Backbone: it’s almost inevitable that also need to learn Marionette, Chaplin, or Thorax.